{"id":1685,"date":"2026-03-10T16:30:29","date_gmt":"2026-03-10T14:30:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.abo.fi\/psych-aid\/?page_id=1685"},"modified":"2026-04-08T14:46:38","modified_gmt":"2026-04-08T12:46:38","slug":"psych-aid-conference-october-2026","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.abo.fi\/psych-aid\/psych-aid-conference-october-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Psych-AID Conference October 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

SOGIESC in Asylum: Evidence-Based and Cross-Cultural Perspectives<\/h1>\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The conference, funded by the Nordic Gender Fund and Stiftelsen f\u00f6r \u00c5bo Akademi, will bring together researchers and practitioners working at the intersection of legal psychology, law, gender studies, and migration, with a focus on evidence-based and SOGIESC (Sexual orientation, Gender Identity, Gender Expression, and Sex Characteristics)-sensitive asylum decision-making.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further details, including the program and registration information, will follow in due course. For now, we warmly invite you to mark your calendars.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\ud83d\udccd Turku, Finland<\/strong> 
\ud83d\udcc5 15\u201317 October 2026<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Edited anthology<\/strong>
The conference will culminate in the preparation of an edited, peer-reviewed anthology bringing together international research on SOGIESC and asylum decision-making. The volume will consolidate interdisciplinary perspectives from legal psychology, law, and gender studies, with the aim of providing a shared empirical and conceptual foundation for future research and practitioner training.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conference participants will be invited to contribute chapters to the anthology. The volume is intended as a lasting scholarly output and as a piece of research infrastructure supporting evidence-based and SOGIESC-sensitive asylum practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

About the organizers<\/strong>

The conference is organized by the Psych-AID research network, an interdisciplinary research group at \u00c5bo Akademi University. We bring psychological and legal evidence to support fair and accurate asylum decision-making. The organizing team brings together expertise in legal psychology and asylum law, collaborating with scholars and practitioners across Europe and beyond.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Key Note speakers<\/summary>\n


We are delighted to have Hilary Evans Cameron<\/strong> (Lincoln Alexander School of Law, Toronto Metropolitan University), Lisa Diamond<\/strong> (University of Utah), Ilan Meyer<\/strong> (the Williams Institute\/UCLA) H\u00fcseyin Ali Kudret <\/strong>(Utrecht University), and Hedayat Selim<\/strong> (\u00c5bo Akademi University) as Key Note Speakers. Additional Key Note Speakers might follow. We will update this page with more information.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

Background<\/summary>\n


Across different Refugee Determination Systems (RSD), asylum decision-making in SOGIESC-based claims (e.g., those involving sexual orientation and gender identity) remains inconsistent and poorly understood. These cases often require asylum decision-makers to assess the credibility of deeply personal experiences\u2014such as identity, relationships, and persecution\u2014especially in the absence of corroborating external evidence. Decision-makers may therefore rely heavily on intuition, implicit expectations, and cultural assumptions, which risks reinforcing bias in decision-making processes and undermining the fairness of asylum decisions.
Qualitative research shows that SOGIESC applicants are often assessed against stereotypical expectations of how sexual or gender minorities should look, behave, or narrate their experiences\u2014for instance, gay men and lesbians being disbelieved for not appearing sufficiently gender nonconforming. Such findings highlight a reliance on disproven psychological assumptions and cultural stereotypes rather than evidence-based criteria.
Yet, there is still little empirical and experimental research that directly examines and causally tests the impact of these biases on asylum decision-making or evaluates systematic, evidence-based ways to mitigate them. Moreover, asylum claims are rarely unidimensional but often intersectional. SOGIESC-related claims frequently intersect with other identity dimensions, such as ethnicity and religion, adding further complexity to the process. Yet, existing empirical research on asylum interviewing has largely overlooked intersectionality. This underscores the need for stronger interdisciplinary collaboration between legal psychology, law, and gender studies to develop systematic, evidence-based approaches for investigating and evaluating SOGIESC-related asylum claims across national contexts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The conference aims to:<\/strong>
– Connect scholars working on SOGIESC and asylum topics across disciplines, institutions, and countries.
– Develop shared conceptual and methodological frameworks for investigating factors around SOGI-related decision-making, including but not limited to assessing and improving common terminology, approaches to data collection and analysis, and principles for cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural collaboration.
– Provide the foundation for sustained joint research outputs.
– Culminate in an edited peer-reviewed anthology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

Key dates and deadlines<\/summary>\n


Abstract deadline for presentation: April 30, 2026
Abstract decision: May 18, 2026

Conference registration: will open in August, 2026

Anthology first draft deadline: January 15, 2027
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

Abstract and anthology information <\/summary>\n


Please submit your oral presentation abstract here<\/a> by April 30, 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tentative themes for conference presentations and the anthology:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The section Legal Foundations<\/strong> clarifies how SOGIESC claims have been incorporated into refugee law, how \u201cparticular social group\u201d jurisprudence has evolved, and how evidentiary and forward-looking standards structure decision-making.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The section Identity and Harm<\/strong> synthesizes psychological research on sexual and gender identity, minority stress, trauma, and concealment, providing conceptual tools for understanding the lived realities that legal categories attempt to capture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The section Credibility and Evidence<\/strong> examines how trauma, stigma, memory processes, digital traces, and cultural expectations affect the evaluation of testimony and supporting materials, distinguishing stereotype-driven reasoning from evidence-informed assessment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The section Risk and Professional Judgment<\/strong> addresses the forward-looking evaluation of persecution risk, the integration of country-of-origin information, the limits of prediction, and the psychological demands placed on decision-makers themselves.

More information will follow.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

Conference registration<\/summary>\n


Conference registration will open in August, 2026.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

Preliminary program<\/summary>\n


Please not that this is a preliminary program and updates and more information will follow. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Day 1 \u2013 October 15 (12:30\u201317:30)<\/strong>

12:00\u201312:30: Registration desk opens
12:30\u201313:00: Welcome remarks
13:15\u201314:00: Keynote \u2013 H\u00fcseyin Ali Kudret
14:00\u201314:15: Coffee break
14:30\u201315:30: Keynote \u2013 Lisa Diamond
15:45\u201317:00: Session talks
17: 00: Mingle and sparkling wine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Day 2 \u2013 October 16 (09:00\u201317:00)<\/strong>

09:00\u201309:30: Coffee
09:30\u201310:30: Keynote \u2013 Hilary Evans Cameron
10:30\u201310:45: Short break
10:45\u201312:30: Session talks
12:45\u201313:45: Lunch
13:45\u201314:30: Keynote \u2013 Hedayat Selim
14:30\u201314:45: Coffee break
14:45\u201316:15: Session talks
16:30\u201317:15: Keynote \u2013 Ilan Meyer
19:30: Conference dinner<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Day 3: Please note, this day is for anthology contributors only<\/strong>

09:30\u201310:00: Coffee and light breakfast
10:00\u201312:30: Collaborative session to outline the structure and thematic focus of the forthcoming edited anthology (title to be confirmed). The session will synthesize ideas from the previous day\u2019s panels and define key contributions. Participants will subsequently be invited to submit extended abstracts for inclusion in the volume.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

SOGIESC in Asylum: Evidence-Based and Cross-Cultural Perspectives The conference, funded by the Nordic Gender Fund and Stiftelsen f\u00f6r \u00c5bo Akademi, will bring together researchers and practitioners working at the intersection of legal psychology, law, gender studies, and migration, with a focus on evidence-based and SOGIESC (Sexual orientation, Gender Identity, Gender Expression, and Sex Characteristics)-sensitive asylum…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1685","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"lang":"en","translations":{"en":1685},"taxonomy_info":[],"featured_image_src_large":false,"author_info":{"display_name":"Obed Kwame Appiah","author_link":"https:\/\/sites.abo.fi\/psych-aid\/author\/7\/"},"comment_info":0,"pll_sync_post":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.abo.fi\/psych-aid\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1685","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.abo.fi\/psych-aid\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.abo.fi\/psych-aid\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.abo.fi\/psych-aid\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.abo.fi\/psych-aid\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1685"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/sites.abo.fi\/psych-aid\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1685\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1757,"href":"https:\/\/sites.abo.fi\/psych-aid\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1685\/revisions\/1757"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.abo.fi\/psych-aid\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1685"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}